🔗 Share this article

Imagine this: a happy the Danish striker in a Napoli shirt. Next, place that with a dejected the Slovenian forward sporting United's jersey, looking as if he just missed an open goal. Don't worry finding a real picture of him missing; context is your adversary. Now, add statistics in a large, comical font. Don't forget some emoticons. Share it everywhere.

Will you mention that Højlund's goal count includes strikes in the premier European competition while Sesko does not compete in Europe? Certainly not. Nor would you note that several of the Dane's goals came against weaker national sides, or that his national team is far superior to Slovenia and generates far more scoring opportunities. If you run online for a large outlet, raw engagement is your livelihood, Manchester United are the biggest draw, and context is your sworn enemy.

Thus the cycle of content spins. Your next task is to sift through a lengthy interview with the legendary goalkeeper and extract the part where he describes the acquisition of Sesko "weird". There's a bit, where Schmeichel prefaces his comments by saying, "I have nothing bad to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, remove that part. No one needs that. Simply make sure "weird" and "Sesko" appear together in the headline. People will be outraged.

This Time of Potential and Hasty Opinions

The heart of fall has traditionally one of my preferred times to watch football. Leaves fall, winds shift, squads and strategies are newly formed, all is novel and yet patterns are emerging. Key players of the season ahead are staking their claims. The transfer window is closed. Nobody is mentioning the multiple trophies yet. All teams are in contention. At this precise point, all is possibility.

Yet, for similar reasons, this period has long been one of my most disliked times to read about football. Because although nothing has yet been settled, opinions must be formed immediately. The City winger is resurgent. The German talent has been a crushing disappointment. Is Antoine Semenyo the top performer in the league at this moment? Please an answer immediately.

The Player as The Prime Example

And for numerous reasons, Sesko feels like the archetype in this context, a player caught between football's opposing, non-negotiable forces. The imperative to withhold final conclusions, allowing layers of technical texture and strategic understanding to mature. And the demand to produce instant definitive judgment, a conveyor belt of opinions and jokes, context-free criticisms and meaningless contrasts, a puzzle that can not truly be solved.

I do not propose to provide a in-depth evaluation of Sesko's time at Manchester United so far. He has started on four occasions in the top flight in a highly unpredictable team, found the net twice, and had a mere of 116 touches. What exactly are we analysing? Nor do I propose to replicate Gary Neville's and Ian Wright's notable debate "The Sesko Debate", in which two of England's leading pundits duel passionately on a podcast over whether he needs ten strikes to be a success this year (Neville), or whether it is more like twelve or thirteen (the other).

A Cruel Environment

For all this I enjoyed watching him at Leipzig: a big, screeching racing car of a striker, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his abilities: afforded the freedom to rampage but also the leeway to fail. Partly this is why United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "harsh judgments" are handed down in roughly the duration it takes to load a pre-roll ad, the club with the widest and most pitiless gap between the patience and space he needs, and the time and air he is going to get.

We saw a case of this during the national team pause, when a viral chart conveniently informed us that the player had been deemed – decisively – the poorest acquisition of the summer transfer window by a survey of football representatives. And of course, the press are not alone in such behavior. Club channels, influencers, unidentified profiles with a oddly high number of fake followers: everybody with skin in the game is now essentially aligned along the identical rules, an ecosystem explicitly nosed towards controversy.

The Psychological Toll

Endless scrolling and tapping. What are we doing to us? Do we realize, on some level, what this infinite sluice of irritation is doing to our brains? Quite apart from the essential weirdness of playing in the middle of this, knowing on some surreal butterfly-effect level that each aspect about them is now basically material, commodity, public property to be packaged and traded.

And yes, in part this is because United are United, the corpse that keeps nourishing the narrative, a big club that must always be producing the big feelings. But also, partly this is a temporary malaise, a pendulum of opinion most visibly and harshly glimpsed at this season, roughly four weeks after the transfer market shut. Throughout the summer we have been desiring footballers, praising them, drooling over them. Yet, just a few weeks in, many of those very players are already being dismissed as broken goods. Is it time to worry about a new signing? Did Arsenal actually need Viktor Gyökeres necessary? What was the point of another expensive buy?

The Bigger Picture

It seems fitting that he meets Liverpool on Sunday: a team simultaneously 13 months unbeaten at home in the league and somehow in their own state of perceived turmoil, like filing a a report on a person who went to the shops half an hour ago. Too open. Mohamed Salah past his prime. Alexander Isak waste of money. Arne Slot losing his hair.

Maybe we have failed to understand the way the narrative of football has begun to supplant football the actual game, to inflect the way we watch it, an entire sport reoriented around talking points and reaction, something that occurs in the backdrop while we browse through our phones, unable to disconnect from the constant flow of opinions and further hot takes. Perhaps Sesko bearing the brunt right now. But in a way, everyone is losing a part of the experience in this process.