🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of Natalia Molina and third-generation Mexican American, the crowning moment of the World Series did not occur during the tense finale on Saturday, when her squad pulled off multiple death-defying comeback act after another and then prevailing in overtime against the opposing team.

It came a game earlier, when two supporting athletes, the Puerto Rican player and Miguel Rojas, pulled off a thrilling, game-winning sequence that at the same time upended numerous harmful misconceptions promoted about Hispanic people in recent decades.

The play in itself was breathtaking: the outfielder charged in from the outfield to catch a ball he at first misjudged in the stadium lights, then fired it to second base to record another, decisive out. Rojas, positioned nearby, received the ball just a split second before a opposing player collided with him, sending him to the ground.

This wasn't just a great sporting moment, perhaps the key turn in the series in the Dodgers' direction after appearing for most of the series like the underdog team. For Molina, it was exhilarating, politically and culturally, a much-required morale boost for Latinos and for the city after a period of immigration raids, troops monitoring the neighborhoods, and a steady drumbeat of negativity from official sources.

"The players put forth this alternative story," said Molina. "The world saw Latinos showing an contagious enthusiasm in what they do, being key figures on the team, exhibiting a distinct kind of masculinity. They are energetic, they're cheering, they're taking off their shirts."

"This represented such a juxtaposition with what we observe on the news – enforcement actions, Latinos thrown to the ground and pursued. It's so simple to be disheartened right now."

Not that it's entirely simple to be a team supporter nowadays – for Molina or for the many of other fans who attend faithfully to home games and occupy as many as 50% of the stadium's 50,000 spots per game.

The Mixed Connection with the Team

When intensified enforcement operations began in Los Angeles in early June, and military units were deployed into the area to react to resulting protests, two of the local sports teams promptly issued messages of solidarity with immigrant families – while the Dodgers.

The team president has said the organization want to steer clear of political issues – a view influenced, perhaps, by the reality that a significant minority of the supporters, including Latinos, are followers of certain leaders. After considerable external demands, the organization later pledged $1m in aid for families personally impacted by the operations but issued no official criticism of the government.

White House Event and Historical Heritage

Three months before, the organization did not hesitate in accepting an invitation to celebrate their previous World Series victory at the White House – a move that sports columnists described as "pathetic … spineless … and hypocritical", considering the team's boast in having been the first professional team to break the racial segregation in the 1940s and the frequent references of that history and the values it represents by executives and present and former athletes. Several team members such as the coach had voiced unwillingness to travel to the event during the initial period but then reconsidered or gave in to demands from the organization.

Corporate Ownership and Supporter Dilemmas

An additional issue for fans is that the Dodgers are controlled by a large investment group, the ownership group, whose investments, as per sources and its own published financial documents, include a share in a detention company that runs enforcement centers. The group's leadership has stated repeatedly that it wants to remain neutral of political matters, but its critics say the inaction – and the investment – are their own type of compliance to current agendas.

All of that contribute to considerable mixed feelings among Hispanic supporters in particular – sentiments that surfaced even in the euphoria of this year's hard-fought championship triumph and the following explosion of Dodgers pride across the city.

"Can one to support the team?" local writer Erick Galindo reflected at the start of the postseason in an thoughtful essay ruminating on "Dodger blue in our blood, but uncertainty in our minds". He was unable to ultimately bring himself to watch the championship, but he still cared deeply, to the point that he decided his one-man boycott must have given the team the luck it required to win.

Separating the Players from the Management

Numerous fans who have Galindo's misgivings seem to have decided that they can continue to back the team and its roster of global players, featuring the Japanese superstar Shohei Ohtani, while expressing disdain on the organization's corporate overlords. At no place was this more clear than at the victory celebration at the home venue on the following day, when the packed audience cheered in approval of the manager and his athletes but jeered the team president and the top official of the investors.

"These men in formal attire do not get to claim our players from us," Molina said. "We have been with the team for more time than they have."

Historical Background and Community Impact

The issue, though, runs deeper than only the team's current owners. The agreement that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to Los Angeles in the 1950s required the municipality demolishing three working-class Latino neighborhoods on a elevated area above downtown and then selling the land to the team for a fraction of its actual worth. A song on a 2005 record that chronicles the story has an low-income worker at the venue revealing that the home he forfeited to eviction is now third base.

Gustavo Arellano, possibly the region's most influential Latino columnist and media personality, sees a more troubling side to the long, dysfunctional dynamic between the team and its audience. He calls the team the popular snack of baseball, "a corporate entity with an undue, even harmful devotion by numerous Latinos" that has been exploiting its fans for years.

"They have put one arm around Latino fans while picking their pockets with the other for so much time because they have been able to avoid consequences," Arellano wrote over the summer, when calls to avoid the organization over its absence of reaction to the raids were contradicted by the uncomfortable reality that turnout at home games remained steady, even at the height of the demonstrations when the city center was subject to a evening restriction.

Global Players and Fan Connections

Distinguishing the squad from its corporate owners is not a simple task, {